Peace Like A River


It was a wide river, mistakable for a lake or even an ocean unless you'd been wading and knew its current. Somehow I'd crossed it... Now I saw the stream regrouped below, flowing on through what might've been vineyards, pastures, orhards... It flowed between and alongside the rivers of people; from here it was no more than a silver wire winding toward the city. - Leif Enger, Peace Like A River

Tuesday, October 11, 2005

Russia's natural resources

An interesting article today in the Orlando Sentinel (via RealClearPolitics) highlights Europe's growing dependence on Russian oil and gas.

A confluence of circumstance and geography is making Europe dangerously dependent on Russian oil and natural gas for its survival.

Already, 50 percent of the oil burned in Europe and 30 percent of the natural gas comes from Russia. The natural gas percentage is likely to rise dramatically with the new northern pipeline, under the Baltic Sea, extending all the way to Britain. Some countries, such as Germany, are likely to become entirely dependent on Russia for gas. They will also be dependent on Russia for some of their electricity because most new electric generation that has been installed relies on gas turbines.

The effect of Russia's energy dominance of Europe is a massive geopolitical change, binding Europe to Russia at the expense of its old alliances.

The Russian penetration of the European markets has been coming for years and has raised alarms in foreign policy circles, but has failed to change the course of Europe's tilt toward Russia. Those European countries that were once under Soviet domination are particularly alarmed at the new Russian hegemony, and some have fought against it.


Ironic that Russia might achieve the strategic geopolitical prominence the Soviets sought not through the nuclear missiles planted in her soil, but through her natural resources buried in it.

There is a race going on here, though. Will Russia's worsening economic and demographic problems overwhelm any benefits derived from her control of valuable energy resources? Or will these resources allow Russia to reverse some of these troubling trends? Time will tell.

-----
Jim Hoagland of the WaPo looks at Putin's approach to Russia's challenges.

6 Comments:

  • At Tue Oct 11, 03:20:00 PM, johngrif said…

    Did I read this correctly? You did say that Communism, having failed to defeat the West ideologically (?) or militarily, will now suceed by force of economics?

    You were referring to that power realignment between America and China, weren't you?

    As a note: Chinese influence is growing in that same Africa the West pledges itself to help.

    Comm. China is very active in Central and South America.

    What source is bankrolling their superpower influence?

     
  • At Tue Oct 11, 04:26:00 PM, Jeff said…

    No, I'm not saying Communism will defeat the West, and certainly not through its economic model.

    (And I was addressing Russia, not China).

    I meant Russia could end up being in a position where it has considerable say in the affairs of European countries.

    For instance, the article says "Some countries, such as Germany, are likely to become entirely dependent on Russia for gas. They will also be dependent on Russia for some of their electricity because most new electric generation that has been installed relies on gas turbines."

    Consider the power that would give Russia. If Germany is totally dependent on Russia for gas, Russia demand X, or they'll squeeze the supply of gas. Same with electricity.

     
  • At Tue Oct 11, 10:52:00 PM, johngrif said…

    Jeff, you did say Russia; your argument is well made.

    And I did say the US and China-- seeing the parallel looming crises.

    There is in both the same vulnerability of Western democracies to nations who are either leaving, or yet yoked to Communist slavery.

    Europe is dead in the water in foreign policy. How long will America maintain our own independence because of our addiction to state subsided Chinese manufacturing?

    I would not agree that China's is a lesser economic model. And it is Communist.

    Just stabbing at this, but I wonder how much of the current world oil squeeze is something more than market manufactured.

    Could it be a sign of Chinese manufacturing muscle and a consequent opportunism to meddle?

    The same energy meddling you worry about in Europe's case?

     
  • At Wed Oct 12, 09:49:00 AM, Jeff said…

    You make an excellent point. Yes, the US does depend on trade with China. Think of all we've overlooked in service to trade.

    You are right, China's economy is not exactly Western free-market. I would say, though, that it is different than the old Soviet 5-year plan model. China's economy is a little more market-oriented than some of the old-style communist economies.

     
  • At Wed Oct 12, 05:29:00 PM, hammerswing75 said…

    How dependant are we on China? The trade deficit is huge. They would stand to lose far more than us by manipulating the market for political gain.

     
  • At Wed Oct 12, 06:00:00 PM, Jeff said…

    Regarding trade deficit, here's some numbers from the State Dept. from January. (It cites $124 billion deficit.)

    Also, here is a current article from Foreign Affairs on China-US relations.

     

Post a Comment

<< Home